Sorry it was not clear that the issue has been that working group discussion
has only been from the perspective you describe and rather steadfastly 'left
out' the one I described.
Of course, any reasonable discussion would include both. But that first
requires acknowledging the relevance of both.
d/
Eric Allman wrote:
SSP is one organization's attempt to tell another
what it should do with mail that is from a third
organization.
You left out an important part of what SSP should (in my opinion,
completely legitimately) try to do:
SSP is one organization's attempt to tell another what it
should do with mail that is from a third organization that
claims to be from the first organization.
Of course, SSP also includes guidance on unsigned messages.
eric
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html