Barry Leiba wrote:
Dave, it's not clear whether you actually object to it, or whether
you're just concerned that others might have a problem with it, and are
noting that it's not standard procedure.
I see these two points choices are compatible.
While a complete answer would prompt us to wander into much larger issues,
let's leave it at:
Before we declare a requirement for a conference call effort, we should
pursue attempting to resolve Issues on the list, in order to assure both the
widest possible participation and better time for contemplation. Real-time
exchanges are useful when folks largely or completely understand issues.
Because they take place over a long time, lists are better for contemplation
and for offlist (hallway) discussion.
Since a number of the Issues involve conceptual points, I believe the
group needs to first use the more deliberative mode of discussion.
Please do note that I did say "widest possible participation". Although
formally open participation, and not nearly as restrictive as a face to face
meeting, a conference call does serve to limit participation. The logistical
issues unavoidably act as a filter.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html