ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] A whole lotta +/-1

2007-12-11 11:36:41
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:

I don't see much if any support for changing the valid first party signature consensus from rfc 5016, and I've
seen a whole lot of -1's.

I've seen a bunch of objections against the redefinition
of originator (i.e. more than Dave+me+Dave+me+Dave+me ;-)

Maybe a poll could help to get a clearer picture of your
"a whole lot of" and my "a bunch of".  If the Chairs like
the idea, Harald sometimes uses polls, but it's a matter
of taste.

I'm all for that if it puts an(other) end to many of these.

        Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>