ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Processing SSP issues in January using jabber/concalls....

2007-12-11 10:52:35
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 12:35, Dave Crocker wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Who is the 'everyone' that you are relying on to vet the decision to do
a variance?

I'm assuming the people subscribed here and the ADs.

For a working group that has repeatedly received complaints about being
exclusive, it would make sense to be particularly careful to follow
procedures that encourage participation.  Sufficient advanced notice seems
a natural part of that.

d/

I'm not aware of any such complaints.  Would you please provide references for 
this assertion?

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>