Michael Thomas wrote:
I don't see much if any support for changing the valid
first party signature consensus from rfc 5016, and I've
seen a whole lot of -1's.
I've seen a bunch of objections against the redefinition
of originator (i.e. more than Dave+me+Dave+me+Dave+me ;-)
Maybe a poll could help to get a clearer picture of your
"a whole lot of" and my "a bunch of". If the Chairs like
the idea, Harald sometimes uses polls, but it's a matter
of taste.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html