-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Only place we're a bit off is the 30 day notice period.
If we want to be strict about that then I guess we can
push the dates further forward, but if everyone's ok with
starting early in the new year, then I think we should be
Who is the 'everyone' that you are relying on to vet the decision
to do
a variance?
I'm assuming the people subscribed here and the ADs.
Say if you think we should be doing something else (in which
case a suggestion would be appreciated).
Well I for one think that many of these issues can be resolved
on the list. For example, I don't see much if any support for
changing the valid first party signature consensus from rfc 5016,
and I've seen a whole lot of -1's.
I agree with Mike. I think we can handle it on-list.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII
wj8DBQFHXuo6sTedWZOD3gYRAparAJ4tIBqukGc2GfhZfF+3R8ffxbDAWQCg7wE3
db5ChMnEbFa409ZEJTX6f+g=
=FFA7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html