Jim Fenton wrote:
But "exception" makes it sound like a kernel panic or something. Hector
had some alternative interpretations of "exception" too. My
suggestion: "non-compliant"/"compliant".
Another possibility is to play off Mike's 5016 "DKIM Signing complete"
semantics:
SSP Complete
All expected conditions were met, including no SSP
record available. However, to be SSP Complete, it
MUST be also "DKIM Signing Complete" per 5016.
The main highlight is that the DKIM and/or DKIM/SSP
transaction CAN NOT be repudiated.
SSP Incomplete
Not all expected conditions were met. NXDOMAIN or
SSP record available, but a known error|non-compliant
condition has been detected. A DKIM Signing Complete
might have been reached, but it failed the SSP process.
The main highlight is that the DKIM/SSP transaction
CAN BE repudiated.
Something along those lines might work.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html