Jim Fenton wrote:
My suggestion: "non-compliant"/"compliant".
If "non-compliant" is actually a "Resent-* as
specified in 2822upd with a twist" (signature
didn't survive it), then that's rather strong.
Why not FAIL ? FAIL is short, neutral, and
some folks are used to the idea that FAIL is
a defined term.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html