ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

[ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1530 - replace use of term "suspicious"

2007-12-18 08:28:41
Jim Fenton wrote:

My suggestion:  "non-compliant"/"compliant".

If "non-compliant" is actually a "Resent-* as
specified in 2822upd with a twist" (signature
didn't survive it), then that's rather strong.

Why not FAIL ?  FAIL is short, neutral, and
some folks are used to the idea that FAIL is
a defined term.

 Frank

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>