ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata

2009-03-13 11:20:45
Folks,

Two days later. Still haven't seen any other issues raised with the draft.

d/

Dave CROCKER wrote:
Folks,
Question to the working group...
DKIM Chair wrote:
To those who voted against draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata: given, now, that 
we 
will be using draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata to move forward, and the other 
choices are off the table, can you accept draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata as 
written?  If not, will you post specific changes, in OLD/NEW format, that 
would 
make it acceptable to you?  


Unless I've missed or misread other postings, the only item lodged, so far, 
has 
been Jim Fenton's suggest that the UAID acronym be replaced, and discussion 
about that is proceeding.

Are there other changes to draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata being proposed?

d/



-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>