Folks,
Two days later. Still haven't seen any other issues raised with the draft.
d/
Dave CROCKER wrote:
Folks,
Question to the working group...
DKIM Chair wrote:
To those who voted against draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata: given, now, that
we
will be using draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata to move forward, and the other
choices are off the table, can you accept draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata as
written? If not, will you post specific changes, in OLD/NEW format, that
would
make it acceptable to you?
Unless I've missed or misread other postings, the only item lodged, so far,
has
been Jim Fenton's suggest that the UAID acronym be replaced, and discussion
about that is proceeding.
Are there other changes to draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata being proposed?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html