On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Pasi's point is that what you're quoting is from the DKIM working
group only, and, at that, only from some 20 participants or so.
There are a lot more people who participate in the IETF, and the
normal process of review by the IESG and IETF last call provides the
opportunity for many more people to review and comment on the
document.
The concern seemed more related to making definitional changes to an
an RFC within an errata.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html