ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata

2009-03-20 13:02:53
OK, now I'm confused. Can someone define IETF rough consensus? The errata had
a 2/3 majority after the last round of discussion... does the IETF ever get a 
better
consensus than that?

Pasi's point is that what you're quoting is from the DKIM working
group only, and, at that, only from some 20 participants or so.  There
are a lot more people who participate in the IETF, and the normal
process of review by the IESG and IETF last call provides the
opportunity for many more people to review and comment on the
document.

Barry
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>