On Apr 30, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 30/Apr/10 12:13, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 28 April 2010 11:02:53 -0400 "MH Michael Hammer (5304)"
<MHammer(_at_)ag(_dot_)com> wrote:
2) One possible recommendation to list managers is that if a message to
the list is DKIM signed AND has an ADSP discardable policy AND the
signature cannot be maintained intact then the list should bounce the
message.
+1
+1, an additional reason is that the author might have a clever DKIM
configuration, but just forgot to add "[ietf-dkim]" in front of the
subject of a new message. A bounce easily prompts for such correction.
So that's another "vote" for option #4 (per the previous post trying to
summarize the various options).
BTW, where is this mail list publicly archived? (Next time I'm referring to a
previous message I'll just include the URL to the post.)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html