ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures

2010-04-30 12:41:27
On 30/Apr/10 12:13, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 28 April 2010 11:02:53 -0400 "MH Michael Hammer (5304)"
<MHammer(_at_)ag(_dot_)com>  wrote:
 2) One possible recommendation to list managers is that if a message to
 the list is DKIM signed AND has an ADSP discardable policy AND the
 signature cannot be maintained intact then the list should bounce the
 message.

+1

+1, an additional reason is that the author might have a clever DKIM 
configuration, but just forgot to add "[ietf-dkim]" in front of the 
subject of a new message. A bounce easily prompts for such correction.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>