--On 24 May 2010 09:08:42 -0400 "John R. Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I guess the list should be rejecting his email! Then, perhaps, his
organisation would get around to deploying a non-discardable domain.
I've suggested it. They know they have a problem, but they won't yet say
what they're going to do about it.
As you may recall, they suggested that lists sign an A-R header and all
recipient systems track what lists they're subscribed to and do
complicated processing to see whether list mail was signed when it showed
up at the list. Oddly, that didn't get much traction.
R's,
John
I do recall. Perhaps if the list (and other lists) were rejecting the mail,
they'd be more likely to act. We don't have to wait for them, do we?
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html