-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:28 AM
To: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] more on discardable, was Lists "BCP" draft
"Roland Turner" <roland(_dot_)turner(_at_)boxsentry(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 26/05/2010 22:48, Steve Atkins wrote:
However, domain B is not an innocent bystander, as they
intentionally
configured their mail system to reject mail it shouldn't, and the
recipients at domain B support that decision, on some level.
Domains don't subscribe to mailing lists, individual recipients do.
The
recipients in a domain may oppose the domain[-administrator]'s
decision,
but often lack the power to have it changed. "Failure to quit your
job"
cannot reasonably be construed as consent/support in this context.
This just brings us back to the "Do domain owners have a right to
control
how their domains get used in email" question.
If they do, the point is irrelevant.
If they don't, email authentication policy is wrong and we should
just
stop.
Scott K
+1
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html