On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy
<msk(_at_)cloudmark(_dot_)com> wrote:
(I might have the "5.7.1" wrong, but you get the idea.)
Ah, my type of tangent. I think 5.7.1 is right. Ideally, in the
future, it would be a 5.8.z. But before even that, we need more folks
to support RFC3463.
--
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html