Dave CROCKER wrote:
Daniel Black stated:
Recipients are an important aspect of the message flow and an
attempting to define a benefit to them from DKIM is an element of
what I'm attempting to define.
That's clear. It's also beyond the skillset of this group. It's also
not required for DKIM to be useful.
Can you provide information or evidence that exhibits DKIM usefulness
and how is the usefulness accomplished?
What augmented technology, method or skillset is required in order to
get the usefulness you see?
If this a future usefulness scope or is it something we can use today?
I ask because I am still looking for a payoff and justification to
support and add it to our mail software and what components within the
framework. I am having a hard time seeing DKIM usefulness.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html