Patrick,
I appreciate your input and advice here. I have not deviated from
most, if not all, of your key notes. What I would trying to extract
from this, is how can DKIM-CORE be coupled with some other, preferably
standard or BCP to get some level of usefulness - something I can use
to explain to customer how it can serve them.
IOW, the implication is such that pure unrestricted DKIM-BASE signing
(by any MTA) has (or can provide) a useful (and non-damaging) purpose
and I wanted to know how that is accomplished without any other
integrated or interfacing design considerations, including MUA and
MLM, both of which we have expert level "skillset."
Anyway, you convinced me that we need to finally get DKIM implemented
abeit as you noted for associated risk reasons, very carefully and
conservatively. Murray's work to consolidate and address the long time
MLM concerns is a major help in my renewed DKIM interest. He is
probably sore for an additional pat on his back. :)
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html