Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists and signatures (fwd)

> The general form of this issue is that MIME processing varies widely
> and maybe wildly.  This is especially true for matters of nesting.
> Any design that relies on consistent handling of nested MIME
> constructions is likely to fail.
You're quite right, and I would extend it to say that any design that
relies on MUAs to do anything consistently is in trouble.

But I do think that S/MIME is as close as anyone's likely to get to a
robust signature that is linked to an individual sender.

R's,
John

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html