-----Original Message-----
From: MH Michael Hammer (5304) [mailto:MHammer(_at_)ag(_dot_)com]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 1:46 PM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; Franck Martin
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
But creating a sub-domain, means that the from needs to match too,
Why? That's an ADSP thing, not a DKIM thing.
I think his goal is to have it be a 1st party signature (From and d=
match) even absent an ADSP assertion. I'm not sure I agree that this is
just "an ADSP thing, not a DKIM thing". We don't publish ADSP yet I have
had receivers tell me that our doing this is useful to them.
In that case, it's neither. DKIM doesn't make a binding between "d=" and
anything else in the message (except "i=", sort-of). Anyone that tries to make
a distinction between first party and not first party is doing something
outside the scope of DKIM.
A message stream, in the context of DKIM, should be evaluated based on the "d="
value, and nothing else.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html