ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-06.txt // Input requirements

2011-04-17 10:25:39
additional discussion and references.  In addition, verifiers MUST
ensure the presence of multiple singleton originating header fields
do not provide a valid signature result.
---

Not including this additional requirement removes recipient assurances a
sender may have expected to be offered by DKIM.

Yes; we discussed this to death and consensus was against saying that.
 Your objection to the consensus is noted; nevertheless, we do have
rough consensus.

Barry, as chair

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>