I don't want to re-hash all the arguments. What we have is a compromise
between two hard-argued positions, and I think reopening it now will just
drag everything out even longer.
I agree that the current language addresses the issue about as well as it
could be addressed, and see no advantage in rearguing it.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet
for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html