On Apr 19, 2011, at 3:55 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
I don't want to re-hash all the arguments. What we have is a compromise
between two hard-argued positions, and I think reopening it now will just
drag everything out even longer.
I agree that the current language addresses the issue about as well as it
could be addressed, and see no advantage in rearguing it.
+1
--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html