-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Hector Santos
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:51 PM
To: Michael Thomas
Cc: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain
Identity"
Its just really odd that the we need to hide the facts in RFC4871bis
but not in RFC5585 (DKIM Architecture) and RFC5863 (DKIM Deployment
Guideline)?
I've lost track of how many times and how many different ways it's been
explained that nothing is being hidden. I'm going to give up now.
But in the mean time, implementors are not listening. They are looking
at other things especially the "author thing" we must burn into the
signature.
Which implementers, and why aren't they saying anything?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html