-----Original Message-----
From: Hector Santos [mailto:hsantos(_at_)isdg(_dot_)net]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 5:33 PM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain
Identity"
Here is the correct message link:
Status and direction
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011194.html
That message (a) was sent six months before ADSP was published, and (b) was
written at a time when ADSP still made use of "i=". If you take the time to
read the text in RFC5617, it doesn't use "i=" at all.
For all and intent and purposes, this message can be reposted today
and still bee relevant,
...except that it doesn't cover what the working group actually published.
covering the final issues we are still dealing
with. Note the chairs recommended move forward items, in particular
#4 which is what I believe we are trying to help with in this WGLC:
4. *Aim 4871bis at incorporating what we've learned since 4871.*
If that results in a document that can and should move to
Draft Standard, we'll do that. If it does not, then 4871bis
will go to Proposed Standard, and it will take another
round of work to move up the standards track.
Sounds like precisely what we've done.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html