Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-----Original Message-----
Ah come on guys! We all know what the problems are, we know the sides
and what colors we wear. Is it possible to come up with a compromise
to solve this conflicts once and for all?
I'm game. Let's play.
I hope that means play nice.
You want AUID and RFC5322.From added to the Output Requirements
section explicitly. At least two other participants disagree on
either technical or procedural grounds.
1) I have not seen any no arguments based on technical merits, or one
that didn't have an substantial proof. Purely procedural and even SM
showed your opinion on procedural (for BIS work) was not quite IETF
correct.
2) There are at least four others (including myself) who agree with
the ODID proposal of both variable or one of them.
So what's the compromise?
Your ball. You are the editor of the documents. Its up to you to
reduce the conflicts with proposed compromising text. Murray, I am
not your problem as much you believe, insist it is.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html