ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations

2011-05-19 12:19:00
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Eiloart [mailto:iane(_at_)sussex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 4:00 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations

Right, but you can't address that by examining only the traffic from
the high traffic domains. If the spammers are spreading across domains,
then you won't see their traffic in that analysis.

But that's not what the report I ran produced.  There's no doubt spammers are 
spreading across domains, but their choice of canonicalization doesn't seem to 
make a difference in that regard.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html