I'm afraid I see no consensus here at all on what problem we're trying to solve, let alone on the right way to solve it. Instead, we're engaged in the time-honored IETF practice of letting the unattainable best be the mortal enemy of the good enough.
I agree. I also see no point in having a session until there are some concrete proposals for signature systems, preferably with multiple implementations, to discuss. I know that Domain Keys is making progress in that direction. Is anyone else?
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Michael Thomas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: reputation, was a BoF at IETF 62?, John Levine |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, ned . freed |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |