ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
John Levine wrote:
I agree. I also see no point in having a session until there are some
concrete proposals for signature systems, preferably with multiple
implementations, to discuss.
Excellent point. A session might make sense given a set of concrete proposals
to focus discussion. It certainly has some small chance of working, whereas
without it I see no hope whatsoever.
Both DomainKeys and Identified Internet Mail are concrete proposals
(active Internet-Drafts) and have multiple implementations. There is a
lot of sentiment that even this is too many, and we need to quickly
(before IETF 62) merge DK and IIM; this seems counter to the requirement
to have multiple proposals.
-Jim (on dialup, and unlikely to respond quickly this week)