I'm afraid I see no consensus here at all on what problem we're
trying to solve, let alone on the right way to solve it. Instead,
we're engaged in the time-honored IETF practice of letting the
unattainable best be the mortal enemy of the good enough.
I agree. I also see no point in having a session until there are some
concrete proposals for signature systems, preferably with multiple
implementations, to discuss.
Excellent point. A session might make sense given a set of concrete proposals
to focus discussion. It certainly has some small chance of working, whereas
without it I see no hope whatsoever.
Ned