Tim Showalter wrote:
This is a second stab at a vacation extension. Please take a look at it.
The draft makes no mention of what the subject should set to for the
message sent back.
Suggestion #1:
The subject is set to the characters "Re: " followed by the original
subject with all leading occurrences of the characters "Re: " stripped
off.
Suggestion #2:
Add the optional argument :subject <string> to the grammar for the
command.
The subject is set to the specified :subject string, if present.
Otherwise, the subject is set to the characters "Re: " followed by the
original subject with all leading occurrences of the characters "Re: "
stripped off.
I like the second suggestion better.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com