Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 11:21 -0400, Tony Hansen wrote:
my very first draft (not submitted) tried to make a change to the
syntax, but it was pointed out on this list that it was ambiguous:
...
my copy now says:
...
looks good
242c242
< When the string is evaluated, substrings matching variable-ref
< shall
---
> When the string is evaluated, substrings matching variable-ref
> SHALL
is it appropriate to use these capitalised forms everywhere? if so,
this should(!) be a MUST.
SHALL and MUST are equivalent in strength. See [KEYWORDS].
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com