Barry Leiba <leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> wrote:
* Consensus -- as I recall it -- was to use two actions:
1. Leave the current action alone, but add text that says that
implementations MAY use protocol-level reject if and only if the
response text is US-ASCII.
Should this requirement be weakened to allow for SMTP i18n
extensions that allow non-ascii response texts?
2. Add a new action that ONLY accepts US-ASCII response text, and that
MUST use protocol-level reject.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
TYNE DOGGER FISHER GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTH 5 TO 7, OCCASIONALLY GALE 8.
ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH. OCCASIONAL RAIN. MODERATE OR GOOD.