Re: Last chance to review draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-10.txt before sendin

Alexey Melnikov writes:
> I actually do have one issue with a recent change in -10 which I 
> consider to be serious, because it broke my Sieve implementation (as 
> well as CMU's)
Why did this break your implementation? It did not cause any previously 
valid scripts to become invalid. All it did was clarify an existing 
rule.
> I actually have a problem with *numbers* being case-insensitive. Cyrus 
> Sieve doesn't accept "k", "m" and "g" prefixes in numbers.
> So I would like to poll the WG regarding this issue. Do people want to 
> make to make number case-insensitive, or should this change be 
> undone?
Making numbers case-sensitive could invalidate extant valid scripts. 
That needs strong justification IMO.
Arnt