On Sat May 7 17:07:38 2011, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Isn't that URNs by the back door, though?
Yes, I suppose it is, at that. Sigh.
> If so, what you could reasonably do is land-grab a URN prefix and
then use
> that form as a shortcut to it. Then you don't even need a
registry.
Still need a registry if we want to allow things other than
"addrbook". But, yes, if not, we don't.
Do you? I think you get to piggyback on the existing URN registry,
essentially.
So the URNs would be of the form
urn:ietf:params:protocols:biscuit-tin:elephant:sieve:addrbook?foo=bar,
but the ":" prefix would expand into the urn:ietf bit all the way up
to sieve.
Do you need a new registry for sub-trees?
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave(_at_)cridland(_dot_)net -
xmpp:dwd(_at_)dave(_dot_)cridland(_dot_)net
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve