--Jon Kyme <jrk(_at_)merseymail(_dot_)com> wrote:
I can't see any sensible way of doing this without the publisher being
able to indicate the intended applicability of the record.
Hey John,
I think you said that before, but I posted my "suggested workarounds" and
nobody has responded to say why those wouldn't work. Do you have some
situations (real or hypothetical) that might demonstrate why this extra
"applicability info" would be needed, and why the workarounds I posted
wouldn't work?
I get the feeling that people are just replying "No it won't work" and not
taking the time to read the suggestions I have made or respond to them. So
far I haven't seen any specific reasons why the single-record-per-domain
wouldn't work, or why the workarounds suggested wouldn't work. This makes
me a little frustrated.
--
Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org>