Jim Lyon wrote:
The biggest problem is that if you publish a new record format, a
significant fraction of the people on the internet will not be able
to see it [...]
... for a while. Maybe I didn't express myself clearly:
Should we use TXT as a stopgap while the new RR isn't deployed?
That's the question I'd like to see answered; do you guys have any
difficulties with that? It would mean extra traffic for DNS servers who
don't support the new RR. On the receiving-MTA side, I don't see any
problem with a second query; if I'm wrong, please correct me.
I'd rather use a new RR for the final infrastructure and make it
binary, since the RR is for machine consumption.
--
Luis Bruno UTM: 29T 629481E 4511776N 576m