Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR

Jon Kyme writes:
> > Nor does it say that all processing must be receiver-side.
> No, you're quite right, but while a minimal MARID may still be in 
> scope, "no MARID" probably isn't :-)
The DNS-based mechanism must use a domain. MARID has to specify an 
algorithm to pick the domain. No escaping that minimum, so "no MARID" 
isn't an option.
Arnt