Harry> Actually, I prefer the name SUBMITTER and would like to
Harry> stick with it. I believe that, from the sender's
Harry> perspective, the name accurately conveys what the parameter
Harry> means. It is only on the receiving side that the value
Harry> becomes "purported."
Yeah. I guess with hindsight including 'purported' in the name of the
identity was a mistake, since whether 'purported' is appropriate
depends on context.
We could always repurpose PRA to stand for Primary Responsible
Address; I'll make a separete post proposing that.
-roy