Roy Badami wrote:
"Yakov" == Yakov Shafranovich <research(_at_)solidmatrix(_dot_)com> writes:
Yakov> Now if all of this is stated in the RFC directly, what
Yakov> exactly is the IPR that is being claimed here? This seems
Yakov> to me explicit in the RFC itself.
I believe that the PRA algorithm, at least in outline, is obvious to a
practitioner skilled in the art.
I'm sure it's pretty much what everyone does mentally when they read
the headers of a message (yeah, ok, I'm a geek, I assume that everyone
understands the semantics of the headers :-)
Then according to RFC 3668 we can safely ignore the IPR claims is
irrelevant and frivilous like it has been done before with IDN and
IPSec. Or can we?
Yakov