On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Tony Finch wrote:
I agree. I also think that in this scenario the mechanism should be CSV
rather than SPF, because CSV is vastly more efficient and less abusive of
the DNS.
And less abusive of the forwarders.
My worry about the current direction to standardize a mailfrom scope is
that there hasn't been a lot of technical discussion about the implication
of changing the return paths by the group.
-Rand