ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: So here it is one year later...

2005-01-28 04:44:58

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 10:19:36PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 terry(_at_)ashtonwoodshomes(_dot_)com wrote:
Wrong again.  And the proof is that there are many domains that implement 
SPF, successfully.

Most them are spammers.

May we see some proof of that please? And with proof i don't mean that
report that is by now almost a year old and which was found to be
incorrect a while ago. 

I don't have proof of the opposite, but i do seem to experience that
many non-spammers are implementing spf (i'm saying this based on the
requests the spf 'tech support team' gets in and activity on spf mailing
lists).

Koen

-- 
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/