Re: So here it is one year later...

ietf-mxcomp

Re: So here it is one year later...

2005-01-29 10:18:33


Frank Ellermann <nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:

You never allowed this to happen here.  You always pressed for
2822 and the IMHO broken Sender-ID concept, and when that failed
you let the A-D close this WG without prior consultation.


  The chairs asked for consensus from the group.  The consensus was to
look at 2822 and Sender-Id.

  Once that happened, further consensus did not occur.

  Alan DeKok.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: So here it is one year later..., (continued) Re: So here it is one year later..., David Woodhouse Re: So here it is one year later..., K.F.J. Martens Re: So here it is one year later..., Frank Ellermann Re: So here it is one year later..., Douglas Otis Re: So here it is one year later..., Hector Santos Re: So here it is one year later..., Douglas Otis Re: So here it is one year later..., Alan DeKok Re: So here it is one year later..., wayne Re: So here it is one year later..., Alan DeKok Re: So here it is one year later..., Frank Ellermann Re: So here it is one year later..., Alan DeKok <= Re: So here it is one year later..., william(at)elan.net Re: So here it is one year later..., wayne Re: So here it is one year later..., Alan DeKok Re: So here it is one year later..., Frank Ellermann Re: So here it is one year later..., Dean Anderson RE: So here it is one year later..., terry RE: So here it is one year later..., Dean Anderson Re: So here it is one year later..., gmc Re: So here it is one year later..., Dean Anderson Re: So here it is one year later..., Justin Mason

Previous by Date:	Re: So here it is one year later..., Andrew Newton
Next by Date:	Re: So here it is one year later..., william(at)elan.net
Previous by Thread:	Re: So here it is one year later..., Frank Ellermann
Next by Thread:	Re: So here it is one year later..., william(at)elan.net
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]