Re: So here it is one year later...

ietf-mxcomp

Re: So here it is one year later...

2005-01-31 13:57:42


wayne <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net> wrote:

I certainly agree that SPF is not perfect.  I am, however, curious
which systems you think do much better than SPF


  I did not say "better".

  There are schemes which, individually, do less than what SPF does.
As a result, they do not have the issues that SPF has, because SPF has
a wider scope and therefore wider side-effects.

  Alan DeKok.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: So here it is one year later..., (continued) Re: So here it is one year later..., gmc Re: So here it is one year later..., Ian Rogers Re: So here it is one year later..., David Woodhouse Re: So here it is one year later..., K.F.J. Martens Re: So here it is one year later..., Frank Ellermann Re: So here it is one year later..., Douglas Otis Re: So here it is one year later..., Hector Santos Re: So here it is one year later..., Douglas Otis Re: So here it is one year later..., Alan DeKok Re: So here it is one year later..., wayne Re: So here it is one year later..., Alan DeKok <= Re: So here it is one year later..., Frank Ellermann Re: So here it is one year later..., Alan DeKok Re: So here it is one year later..., william(at)elan.net Re: So here it is one year later..., wayne Re: So here it is one year later..., Alan DeKok Re: So here it is one year later..., Frank Ellermann Re: So here it is one year later..., Dean Anderson RE: So here it is one year later..., terry RE: So here it is one year later..., Dean Anderson Re: So here it is one year later..., gmc

Previous by Date:	Re: So here it is one year later..., wayne
Next by Date:	Re: So here it is one year later..., Douglas Otis
Previous by Thread:	Re: So here it is one year later..., wayne
Next by Thread:	Re: So here it is one year later..., Frank Ellermann
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]