On Thu, 26 May 2005, wayne wrote:
These I-Ds also call for a new version number to be used, which is good,
but then these I-Ds say that the new semantics should be applied to
SPFv1 records, which is REALLY bad.
I strongly agree. This makes it impossible to use SPF's baroqueness to
advantage, e.g. by using BATV with stunt DNS servers, and other clever
tricks.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.