Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-openpgp-openpgp-15 ends Oct 28 1700EDT

Jon Callas wrote:

> The possible outside exception is the "Cleartext Signatures" thread,  
> where I believe there's no consensus for a change, but I don't see  
> anything that can't be added in WGLC if that's not the case.
Ben raised an issue about the blank line separating
the headers from the armour.  Is that mandatory or
not?  I think it should be.

iang