Re: [openpgp] 4880bis status

I would agree with Werner that it's essentially done, with minor tweaks being 
the only thing really remaining.

That said, I'd say limiting the maximum AEAD chunk size would be classified 
under 'minor tweak' in my book.

-Bart

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 2:50 AM, Neal H. Walfield 
<neal(_at_)walfield(_dot_)org> wrote:

> Hi,
> Werner wrote on gnupg-devel(_at_)gnupg(_dot_)org that he views 4880bis as 
> done,
> and the recent proposals as "severe last minute changes".
> Is there general consensus that 4880bis is done?
> Is further discussion of the changes to 4880bis no longer desired?
> Are new proposals no longer desired?
> Thanks!
> Neal
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:36:43 +0100,
> Werner Koch wrote:
> > Those folks who are trying to get severe
> > last minute changes into a revision of a standard may be better off to
> > start their protocol from scratch.
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp