ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Site policy vs. HELO

2005-03-08 13:28:56
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Bruce Lilly wrote:

<winserver(_dot_)support(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com>: host 
mail.winserver.com[208.247.131.9] said:
    550 Return Path not verifiable. (in reply to RCPT TO command)

I also like the protocol breakage in the response to EHLO (looks like the
same bug affects the banner too).

smtpc: < 220-winserver.com Wildcat! ESMTP Server v6.0.451.3 ready
smtpc: < 220-winserver.com Wildcat! ESMTP Server v6.0.451.3 ready
smtpc: < 220-************** WARNING:  FOR AUTHORIZED USE ONLY! 
**********************
smtpc: < 220-* THIS SYSTEM DO NOT AUTHORIZE THE USE OF ITS PROPRIETARY 
COMPUTERS    *
smtpc: < 220-* AND COMPUTER NETWORKS TO ACCEPT, TRANSMIT, OR DISTRIBUTE 
UNSOLICITED *
smtpc: < 220-* BULK E-MAIL SENT FROM THE INTERNET. THIS SYSTEM WILL RESTRICT 
ACCESS *
smtpc: < 220-* TO CAN-SPAM (US S. 877) COMPLIANT CLIENTS ONLY.                  
    *
smtpc: < 220 
************************************************************************
smtpc: > EHLO cyan.csi.cam.ac.uk
smtpc: < 250-winserver.com, Pleased to meet you.
smtpc: < 250-winserver.com, Pleased to meet you.
smtpc: < 250-SIZE 5120000
smtpc: < 250-ETRN
smtpc: < 250-AUTH CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN PLAIN-MD5 SHA-1
smtpc: < 250-AUTH=LOGIN
smtpc: < 250 HELP

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: EAST OR NORTHEAST 3 OR 4. FAIR. GOOD.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>