IETF SMTP (date)
March 31, 2005
- "addressing" comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 18:42
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Hector Santos, 16:31
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Keith Moore, 15:39
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, ned+ietf-smtp, 14:58
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Mark E. Mallett, 14:32
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 13:37
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Hector Santos, 13:35
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 12:30
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 12:25
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 11:58
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Claus Assmann, 11:26
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 11:09
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Claus Assmann, 11:01
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 10:53
- Re: Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 10:46
- Extraneous CRs in transfer of draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 09:59
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04:07
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Frank Ellermann, 02:57
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Frank Ellermann, 01:14
March 30, 2005
- Re: Editorial/typographical/grammatical/punctuation/usage/formatting/charset/simple comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 22:14
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 21:50
- Re: Editorial/typographical/grammatical/punctuation/usage/formatting/charset/simple comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 20:53
- Re: Editorial/typographical/grammatical/punctuation/usage/formatting/charset/simple comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 20:34
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Mark E. Mallett, 20:15
- Re: Editorial/typographical/grammatical/punctuation/usage/formatting/charset/simple comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 18:19
- Editorial/typographical/grammatical/punctuation/usage/formatting/charset/simple comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 15:04
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 13:54
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 11:54
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Hector Santos, 11:26
- Re: Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Hector Santos, 11:23
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 10:23
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Bruce Lilly, 09:13
- Re: Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, willemien, 08:35
- Re: Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, willemien, 08:27
- Re: Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, willemien, 08:27
- Re: -draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt SIEVE and Message filtering, willemien, 08:26
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Hector Santos, 07:37
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Hector Santos, 06:38
- Re: pseudo LAST CALL - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, willemien, 02:55
March 14, 2005
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 09:48
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 08:32
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 08:24
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 07:00
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 06:39
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John C Klensin, 05:50
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 05:30
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John C Klensin, 05:16
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:09
March 13, 2005
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Frank Ellermann, 16:22
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 16:15
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 16:08
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 15:49
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 15:43
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 14:58
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 14:42
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John C Klensin, 14:41
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 13:10
March 11, 2005
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 17:41
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John C Klensin, 16:11
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball, Bruce Lilly, 10:41
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John Leslie, 10:36
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 10:11
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 09:54
- Has the IETF dropped the ball, David MacQuigg, 09:52
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 08:56
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 08:44
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Hector Santos, 08:28
- Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 07:34
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Bruce Lilly, 07:22
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, David MacQuigg, 06:09
March 10, 2005
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Russ Allbery, 20:41
- Re: Impossibility of Stopping Spam, Russ Allbery, 20:38
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Frank Ellermann, 20:21
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Glenn Anderson, 20:20
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, David MacQuigg, 20:03
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Glenn Anderson, 17:54
- (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 15:21
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Hector Santos, 13:24
- Re: one use for mail folders, Hector Santos, 13:23
- Re: New Authenticated: header?, Bruce Lilly, 13:16
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Hansen, 13:09
- Re: Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, Bruce Lilly, 13:04
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 13:00
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 12:59
- Re: Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, Carl S. Gutekunst, 12:59
- smtp mailing list activity, Dave Crocker, 12:55
- Impossibility of Stopping Spam, David MacQuigg, 12:48
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 12:42
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 12:39
- one use for mail folders, Keith Moore, 12:32
- Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Keith Moore, 12:32
- Re: Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, David MacQuigg, 12:31
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 12:18
- Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, David MacQuigg, 12:16
- What is the impact of enforcing SMTP compliancy?, Hector Santos, 12:14
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Finch, 12:04
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Bruce Lilly, 11:58
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Finch, 11:31
- Re: New Authenticated: header?, David MacQuigg, 11:25
- Re: New Authenticated: header?, Tony Finch, 11:21
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Bruce Lilly, 10:33
- Re: Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, Bruce Lilly, 10:24
- Re: New Authenticated: header?, Bruce Lilly, 10:16
- Re: New Authenticated: header?, Bruce Lilly, 10:14
- Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Hector Santos, 09:28
- Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore, 09:14
- Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:51
- Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore, 08:35
- Do we need SMTP compliance?, David MacQuigg, 08:17
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 07:35
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 06:24
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 06:09
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 04:55
March 09, 2005
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Frank Ellermann, 21:05
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 20:03
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Frank Ellermann, 19:29
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 16:38
- Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, David MacQuigg, 16:27
- Re: New Authenticated: header?, David MacQuigg, 16:25
- Re: New Authenticated: header?, Tony Finch, 15:25
- Re: New Authenticated: header?, Hector Santos, 15:25
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 14:49
- New Authenticated: header?, John Leslie, 14:18
- what is spam?, Dave Crocker, 14:04
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Russ Allbery, 13:54
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 13:42
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 13:33
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 13:14
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 13:06
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 12:34
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 12:26
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 11:48
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 11:23
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Eric A. Hall, 10:59
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 10:53
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 10:33
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Hansen, 10:25
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 07:30
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 06:19
- Re:, Hector Santos, 05:38
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04:59
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 04:35
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 02:55
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 01:30
March 08, 2005
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 22:33
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 20:01
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 16:13
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Russ Allbery, 15:51
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 15:44
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Russ Allbery, 15:37
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Eric A. Hall, 15:00
- Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Bruce Lilly, 14:35
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 14:28
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Tony Finch, 13:28
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 13:15
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 12:51
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, John C Klensin, 10:11
- Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 09:50
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 09:41
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Bruce Lilly, 08:21
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, John C Klensin, 06:40
March 07, 2005
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 22:54
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Frank Ellermann, 21:39
- Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Bruce Lilly, 21:21
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Bruce Lilly, 21:12
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 17:26
- Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Hector Santos, 16:12
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Keith Moore, 15:41
- Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, willemien, 15:14
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 06:43
March 05, 2005
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 15:49
- Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Frank Ellermann, 14:46
- Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 12:38
- Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, willemien, 07:55
March 02, 2005
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Keith Moore, 21:34
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 16:56
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Vince Sabio, 12:42
- Re: Site policy vs. HELO, EdLevinson, 12:29
- Site policy vs. HELO, Vince Sabio, 11:03