Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?

ietf-smtp

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?

2005-03-10 08:51:58

from [Arnt Gulbrandsen]

[Permanent Link]

Pro: Rejecting messages with errors in the SMTP commands willeliminate most spam.
The Pro argument isn't true.

Have a look at http://archive.iecc.com/article/spamtools/20050223008 orany page about greylisting. Even if the spammers' commands are correct,other aspects of their SMTP implementations appear to have certaindefects.


Arnt

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, (continued) Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore Impossibility of Stopping Spam, David MacQuigg Re: Impossibility of Stopping Spam, Russ Allbery Has the IETF dropped the ball, David MacQuigg Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball, Bruce Lilly Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Hansen Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos Do we need SMTP compliance?, David MacQuigg Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Arnt Gulbrandsen <= Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Hector Santos What is the impact of enforcing SMTP compliancy?, Hector Santos

Previous by Date:	Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore
Next by Date:	Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore
Previous by Thread:	Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore
Next by Thread:	Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]